LinkedIn, Reddit, email, search, Product Hunt: it's a helpfully long list for anyone staring down the barrel of a go-to-market calendar. But choice is the killer - where do you start, and what do you say?
Here, we'll start with the buyer, then work out how we can reach them.
Find evidence of where the buyer goes
Your customer record should tell you where people ask questions, compare products, seek advice, search, and/or discuss the problem you're solving. Interviews, sales, referrals, search terms, public conversations, and marketplace reviews can all supply evidence to validate this.
“Small-business owners use Facebook” is an assumption. “Three independent groomers said they ask a private Facebook group about booking problems” gives you somewhere to investigate. You still need to check whether you can join, and what you're allowed to do there.
That place, or routeThe sequence from a customer's first encounter with the product through recognition, proof, next action, payment, delivery, and result. The distribution channel is one part of that sequence., is your distribution channelThe place or route through which you reach a customer. Examples include direct email, a community, search engine, marketplace, partner, event, publication, or paid placement.; the action inside it is the tacticThe specific action you take inside a distribution channel. Answering a question is a tactic; the community where it appears is the channel.. Reddit might be the channel, while answering one groomer's question about deposits might be the tactic; keeping both in your record stops a poor tactic making a viable channel look useless.
Check whether you can get in
A channel can contain the right people and still be unavailable to you; accessWhether you can reach your chosen customer through a channel. Rules, eligibility, cost, format, existing relationships, and the trust needed before an approach is welcome all affect access. depends on rules, cost, eligibility, relationships, and how much trust your approach needs.
Reddit is a good example. You can find a subreddit where people discuss the problem, write a promotional post, and have it removed almost before you've hit 'post'. Reddit prohibits repeated or unsolicited mass engagement, asks people who mainly link to their own business to consider how often they post, and tells users to check each community's rules; moderators decide what their community considers unwanted. (Reddit Help, updated May 19, 2026)
The subreddit rules are part of the channel, however annoying that might seem (though if you're on the receiving end of sales posts, you may have a different opinion). A removed post tells you the planned action wasn't allowed, but it tells you nothing about whether the buyer has the problem, understands the offer, or would pay. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
The same check applies elsewhere. A marketplace may require approval; a partner may have no reason to introduce you; an event may cost more than the test budget. A public email address gives you a contact route, while relevance, timing, law, and the buyer's expectations still apply (just ask X what they think about GDPR).
How much trust does the next step need?
People judge how a product reached them alongside what it promises: a recommendation carries the sender's relationship (the most trust you could ask for); search and marketplaces meet someone already looking. A direct message interrupts them, so it needs a credible reason to arrive now (like replying to somebody who's already described the problem in public), and publishing your writing gives people a record to inspect, although creating it takes time.
The more you ask someone to risk, the more trust you need before they act. A free guide can arrive from a Reddit answer or short video because the reader gives you a few minutes; $20,000 software holding customer data needs budget, security approval, and several colleagues. The $39 booking tool asks for less, so a clear demonstration may be enough for a groomer to try it.
Where we should start
Let's investigate where to begin when you have no audience and need enough information to decide whether to keep going:
| If you're selling | First channels I'd investigate | Why they belong near the top |
|---|---|---|
| B2B or SaaS | Targeted cold outreach, LinkedIn, and Reddit or another niche community | The buyer can often be named by role or company, and a public problem gives you a reason to speak to them |
| A visual D2C product | Instagram or TikTok when the product demonstrates well; Pinterest when people plan, compare, or save before buying | The product can be understood visually, and the route from discovery to purchase is short |
| A product people need help understanding | TikTok, Instagram, or YouTube for visual teaching; search and GEO for questions people type | A clear explanation shows how you think and gives the buyer a next step into the product |
| A local service | Google Business Profile, local search, referrals, and local groups | The customer is looking for somebody nearby, and hours, reviews, location, and availability help them choose |
| A product inside an existing ecosystem | The relevant marketplace or app store, ecosystem partners, and the communities around them | The buyer uses the product your offer plugs into, so the context and route to installation already exist |
Educational content can do two jobs, and do them really well. TikTok, Instagram, or YouTube can help somebody recognize a problem they weren't looking for (and make for a quick and easy personal connection with your desired audience); search and AI answers meet somebody already asking a question. GEO helps the same content appear in AI answers, and Google says its AI features use normal search requirements without special GEO markup. (Google Search Central, accessed September 2026)
What happens after the manual test
Your first attempts to reach your customers in the channel you select can - and should - be manual; then we must consider whether reaching more suitable buyers will always require the same number of hours. Research and writing may get faster, a partner may repeat an introduction, and a page may appear in search more than once. Once proven, you need to be able to scaleReaching more suitable customers without adding the same amount of personal time for every additional person. A route may get faster through repeated research, a template, partner, recommendation, indexed page, marketplace listing, paid placement with working economics, or another person running a known process. the route.
Four checks before the first test
A route stays in consideration only while the buyer, access, trust, and future effort fit the brief.
Check for observed or reported buyer evidence, permission and cost, enough trust for the requested customer action, and a plausible way for future reach to improve. A failed check sends the route to research, removal, a later review, or reconsideration.
- 01Buyer
My buyer is here.
No buyer evidenceResearch
- 02Access
My action is allowed and affordable.
Access blockedRemove or change the action
- 03Trust
I can build enough trust for the customer action.
Trust exceeds current timeLater
- 04Future effort
More reach won't always require the same extra hours.
Effort can't improve enoughReconsider the route or economics
“My buyer is here” needs observed or reported evidence. Future effort is a plausible route to improvement, not proof of scale.
The above are starting points, but your buyer still needs to be there; the route must carry enough trust for the next action, and you need a way in. Starting with 1-2 supported options is enough for now.
Put the dog-groomer routes side by side
Suppose you're continuing with the booking platform from Pricing, which takes a customer's deposit when they book an independent dog groomer. You've kept the illustrative $39 monthly subscription, need one paid account, and have three possible routes:
| Route | Buyer and access | Trust | Later reach | Current decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional grooming community | Groomers discuss no-shows; rules block promotion | Contributing could build trust; the product post is unavailable | Participation may reach more members | Remove the post; check whether helpful participation is allowed |
| Personal messages | Five groomers have described no-shows or deposit problems and list business contacts | The problem gives each message a reason; the product has no customer proof | Research and writing may get faster if objections repeat | Choose for the first manual test |
| Search page | Search results include dog-groomer deposit software pages, suggesting some intent | The page needs enough detail and proof | One page may be found repeatedly | Keep for later; reach before the review is unknown |
The five personal messages are the first test because five suitable groomers are available now; building an elaborate search strategy first may be a sophisticated form of procrastination. The buyer, $39 offer, reason for writing, and requested next step stay consistent, while the record covers replies, questions, payment, time, and where each person stopped. Five attempts give you a better starting point than guessing about every channel at once, although they won't prove the channel.
Keep benchmarks in their place
An industry percentage describes somebody else's campaigns; it can't decide whether your buyer, message, proof, price, or route is right. Belkins analyzed 7.5 million cold emails sent during 2025 and reported a 0.45% average reply rate, calculated as replies divided by all emails sent. The study counts replies and doesn't measure purchases, while agency campaigns at that volume are a long way from five personal messages to groomers who've discussed the problem. (Belkins, 2026)
A 0.45% reply rate sounds precise, although without the denominator and definition of “reply” it gives you less information than we might think.
No cross-channel percentage or fixed number of days can settle the decision; a personal approach may produce a quick reply, while publishing and search need longer before silence means much. The hours, cash, customer actionWhat you need the route to produce now. That could be a suitable customer replying, agreeing to a conversation, paying a deposit, buying, renewing, or referring somebody., and time in your distribution brief set the review date.
Understand what the evidence says
At the review, we should be able to pin down one of the next steps:
- Continue when suitable buyers are reachable, and the customer action begins to repeat within the cash and hours available.
- Change one part when replies, refusals, or customer behavior point to a specific problem with the timing, message, proof, offer, or next step.
- Pause the route when the buyer isn't present, the rules prevent the action, or building enough trust takes more time and money than you've allowed.
- Return to earlier work when repeated conversations challenge the customer you chose, the problem, how you explain the product, the price, or the product itself.
One purchase or one silence doesn't settle anything; a removed Reddit post belongs in the access row, while five unanswered messages leave the buyer list, timing, wording, proof, offer, and requested action open. A repeated objection gives you one part to examine before changing channels.
By the end, you've written down the choice, first attempt, limits, review date, and what would change your mind; Chapter 11 turns that route into a tactic.
Prompt: choose my first distribution channel
This prompt works after you've completed your distribution brief. Your customer, positioning, pricing, previous route records, and links to current platform or community rules all belong in the input.
Choose my first distribution channelShow or hide prompt
I need to choose one distribution channel to test first.
Purpose
Compare the routes I can realistically use and produce one channel choice with
a bounded first action. Keep facts, assumptions, missing information,
benchmarks, and recommendations separate.
When to use this
I have completed my distribution brief and know which customer action I need
now. I am choosing where to reach that customer before planning the detailed
tactic.
My context
- Product or service: [what I sell]
- Customer group: [who I am concentrating on]
- User, buyer, and approver: [who uses, pays, and approves]
- Problem and the moment it becomes urgent: [customer evidence]
- Customer action I need now: [conversation / paid pilot / deposit / purchase /
repeat purchase / renewal / referral]
- Positioning: [how I currently explain the product]
- Price and what the customer pays for: [amount and charging model]
- Gross profit available from the first sale or conservative first year:
[amount / I don't know]
- Proof I have: [results, demonstration, references, reviews, or none]
- Cash available for the test: [amount]
- Hours available each week: [number]
- Date by which I need an answer: [date]
- Existing access: [people, audience, list, community, marketplace, partners,
or none]
- Routes I have already tried: [action, buyer, result, cash, hours, and date]
Possible routes
For each route, include the evidence I have that the customer spends time there
and a link or note about any access, promotion, eligibility, or advertising
rules.
1. [route and evidence]
2. [route and evidence]
3. [route and evidence]
4. [optional]
5. [optional]
Your task
1. Extract only the facts I supplied. Keep source names, links, and dates.
2. List my assumptions and missing information. Don't fill them with likely
answers or invent communities, search behavior, relationships, platform
rules, customer evidence, or results.
3. Compare three to five plausible routes using four questions:
- Where does my selected customer spend time when this problem appears?
- How easily can I reach them there before they know or trust me?
- How could I build enough trust for the customer action I need?
- How could the route eventually reach more suitable customers without the
same increase in my hours?
4. Separate the distribution channel from the action I would take inside it.
5. Check whether each proposed action is allowed. Use only the rules I supplied;
mark every unknown rule for research.
6. Compare the cash, hours, proof, buying steps, and time to an answer with my
distribution brief.
7. Treat every external benchmark as context. Give its source, date, customer,
measured action, sample, and denominator. Don't use a benchmark as my target
or invent a guaranteed number of attempts.
8. Recommend one first channel and one manual action. Explain the choice using
my buyer, access, trust, possible later reach, time, and cash.
9. Create a review rule with four possible decisions: continue, change one part,
pause the route, or return to earlier customer, problem, positioning, pricing,
or product work. State the observed evidence that would support each choice.
10. Identify the information that could change your recommendation.
Output
# My first distribution channel
## Facts from my distribution brief
## Routes I can plausibly use
## Missing information and rule checks
## Comparison
## My chosen first channel
## My first manual action
## What I will record
## Continue, change, pause, or return
## Evidence and assumptions
## Next review
Use standard Markdown. Write the record in my first person. Don't invent
customer evidence, rates, results, platform behavior, or quotations.Sources
- Alice Bull. “Which Channel Should You Actually Start With?”. Romy, June 21, 2026; updated June 22, 2026.
- Reddit Help. “Spam.” Updated May 19, 2026; accessed September 15, 2026.
- Belkins. “What are B2B Cold Email Response Rates? (2026 Study).” Based on 7.5 million emails sent in 2025; accessed September 15, 2026.
- LinkedIn Marketing Solutions. “B2B Marketing.” Accessed September 15, 2026.
- TikTok for Business. “Small Business Marketing on TikTok: The Ultimate Guide.” August 22, 2024; accessed September 15, 2026.
- Meta. “Introducing Instagram Reels.” August 5, 2020; updated May 1, 2023; accessed September 15, 2026.
- Pinterest Business. “How Pinterest Works.” Accessed September 15, 2026.
- Google Business Profile Help. “Tips to Improve Your Local Ranking on Google.” Accessed September 15, 2026.
- Google Search Central. “AI Features and Your Website.” Accessed September 15, 2026.
Glossary
Glossary9 terms
The meanings carried by the highlighted terms in this chapter.
- Access
- Whether you can reach your chosen customer through a channel. Rules, eligibility, cost, format, existing relationships, and the trust needed before an approach is welcome all affect access. Chapter definition
- Benchmark
- A result from somebody else's activity, such as replies divided by emails sent. Before comparing it with your test, check the source, date, audience, measured action, sample, and denominator. Chapter definition
- Customer action
- What you need the route to produce now. That could be a suitable customer replying, agreeing to a conversation, paying a deposit, buying, renewing, or referring somebody. Chapter definition
- Distribution channel
- The place or route through which you reach a customer. Examples include direct email, a community, search engine, marketplace, partner, event, publication, or paid placement. Chapter definition
- Manual test
- A bounded first attempt that you carry out yourself. It names the customer, channel, action, offer, cash, hours, evidence to record, and review date. Chapter definition
- Permission
- The rule, relationship, or reasonable expectation that allows an action inside a channel. It might come from a community rule, introduction, opt-in, public business contact route, advertising product, or another documented basis. Legal requirements depend on the country, message, and recipient. Chapter definition
- Route
- The sequence from a customer's first encounter with the product through recognition, proof, next action, payment, delivery, and result. The distribution channel is one part of that sequence. Chapter definition
- Scale
- Reaching more suitable customers without adding the same amount of personal time for every additional person. A route may get faster through repeated research, a template, partner, recommendation, indexed page, marketplace listing, paid placement with working economics, or another person running a known process. Chapter definition
- Tactic
- The specific action you take inside a distribution channel. Answering a question is a tactic; the community where it appears is the channel. Chapter definition